X

The Very Sight Of Them Disturbs

4849720efe3902bfaf8dd11af9d0e476Sammy Bell
San Francisco, CA

Blazing Saddles is a satirical comedy by Mel Brooks that mocks racism, elitism, class-ism, cronyism, and sexism in a western spoof.

One part of the movie that was most telling to me about the experience of racism for Blacks included the line “I want the very sight of him to upset them”.

This line is spoken by a corrupt senator who wants to destroy a small town to clear way for the new railroad. One part of his plan is to force a new sheriff on them that they would hate so much that they would want to leave. So he stops the hanging of a black man and decides to send him to the town as the new sheriff.

The following scenes of the various reactions to seeing a sheriff who is a black man are hilarious in the movie. But sadly they ring true in many ways for real life experiences of Blacks. The real life experiences are from the misguided perception that you are somewhere you don’t belong… so you are probably about to do something that you shouldn’t be doing. Or you have something that you shouldn’t have… so you probably came into possession of it illegally.

I don’t know how the trial of George Zimmerman will be decided, but his whole encounter with Trayvon Martin that resulted in Trayvon’s tragic death is a good example of the point I’m trying to make. The very sight of Trayvon Martin in the neighborhood was disturbing to George Zimmerman. It was so disturbing to him that he followed Trayvon in spite of being given sensible advice to stop following him.

George Zimmerman was convinced in his mind that Trayvon was somewhere that he didn’t belong and that he was probably about to do something that he shouldn’t be doing. I believe George Zimmerman thought he was going to be a hero that night. Instead Trayvon Martin was killed and George Zimmerman became a national example of how quickly you can morph from being a ‘wannabe hero’ to a goat.

All cases of disturbed reactions don’t turn out tragically in the death of an innocent person like this situation. But all cases are tragic in how they perpetuate race relation issues.

Man tried for shooting black teen.

KK Boas
Austin, TX

Associated Press says “A man with a gun. A black teen, shot dead”
ABC news says “The trial of a Florida man accused of shooting a black teenager begins today in a case that has drawn similarities to the George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin case.”
Even the Daily Beast, in an article entitled “White Fear Matters More Than Black Lives” says “A Florida jury failed to convict yet another man for killing an unarmed black teenager.”
If we name the race of the victim, should we not also name the race of the accused?

Why not start at the beginning?

Susan Roedl
Minneapolis, MN

Like much of the country I’m sad and confused at the Trayvon Martin verdict. How can George Zimmerman claim self defense when he got out of his car to pursue his victim? Why did the trial center on the end of Zimmerman and Martin’s encounter and not the beginning? So much talk in our country about personal responsibility yet it’s application is very selective.

I just want to scream, cry

Bruce Beckerink
Franklin, TN

I’m scared and disappointed.
To Juror B37 – if Zimmerman “got the ball rolling” but “went over the top” how is that he was justified in taking a life exactly? I’m not blaming you – you did your job, according to the rules you were given, but the question is still valid. When someone chooses to arm themselves with a weapon that can take a life, and use it, how can what amounts a mistake in (at the very least) judgment be let go without consequence? Shouldn’t the tie have gone to the runner (aka, victim) in this case?
To the contributor who shall remain nameless (whose response to this site was seen on the PBS Newshour the other night), who’s tired of all the racial talk, that racism doesn’t exist, I hope you’re simply simple, otherwise I’d have to conclude that maybe your just so much like so many people – it’s hard to see yourself for who you might really be. Racism is there – not everywhere, but there enough, just under the surface in a lot of places.
We’re a white family. No, we’re a family of color. 19 years ago, we adopted a boy of color – mixed race, but to a good deal of the world he’s black. He looks a good deal like Trayvon Martin.
Since my son turned 12, he’s been my size or bigger – long legs, walks fast. Over the past seven years, I’ve seen this happen time and again. He’s ahead of me by a good distance, walking into a store. Me, walking in behind, able to see how the staff reacts as he walks in, unbeknownst to them that this black kid walking in the store belongs to me. I can see it plain as day – radars on and red flags go up as he enters the store. Only when the staff sees that he’s with “that older white guy,” do they relax. I’ve sometimes made a game of keeping my distance, finding the security guy and watching his reaction as he realizes he’s been wasting his time following my son around. Profiling happens all the time.
As a white guy, I’ve been in way too many situations where folks around me have been willing to let their guard down – make some comments (nod, nod, wink, wink) about blacks, Hispanics, whomever. Racism, culturalism is there, just under the surface – in way too many places.
What scares me is that what happened to Trayvon Martin could happen to my son, and that so many folks don’t see this as a problem. My kid, who like a of 19 year olds of any race or class, doesn’t choose to dress like he belongs to the county club set (seems that’s a criterion for not being lumped into the thug category by the cultural myopic set who think that white, middle class khaki’s and golf shirts are required decorum), but who’s looking forward to one day being a police officer and works hard at his lawn care business could just as easily chosen to stand his own ground when followed by “some guy thinking he’s doing good” (as Juror B37 implies) – and maybe lose his life.
I’m not advocating gun control – we live in a society that simply won’t let that happen (although laws like the one in FL do need some “adjusting”). But, what I am advocating is that we hold individuals who choose to arm themselves, and take the sort of action Mr. Zimmerman took, to be held accountable when they make mistakes. If enough Zimmerman’s are held truly accountable, maybe there will be fewer things happening requiring this sort of accountability. It’s just so unfortunate that it will take more lives to be lost before we’ll be able to collectively come to our senses, if we ever really will.

Conversations about race are existentially dangerous.

Martin MacKenzie
Clackamas, OR

I think these discussions have become so politically charged that no on can escape danger to one’s job, civil liability, or even in some cases, criminal charges. We even have thought laws now, an issue which was brought up in the George Zimmerman – Trayvon Martin trial. For those who remain after this terrible conflict, hopefully cooler minds will prevail before more damage is done to our society.

Race separates: it should unite us.

Elizabeth M Shontz
Parker, NM

I was on a murder trial several years ago. This is serious business and if there is not enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, there will be no conviction. Zimmerman should never have been charged in the first place. He acted within the parameters of Florida law which a clueless and inflammatory media failed to grasp. This only became about race when Zimmerman was found not guilty thanks to a media that thinks black people will believe
anything you tell them. I know two sets of parents who have lost children to murder. This is a grief that hopefully most of us will never have to endure. I believe the Martins were taken advantage of by “civil rights leaders” who are interested only in their self-aggrandizement. It’s time to leave them alone. They have a long road of sorrow and hopefully healing ahead. Let’s put attention and resources on solving the enormous problem of black on black crime, particularly youth. The media doesn’t seem to have much to say about that.

Zimmerman verdict made me “the other.”

Christina Wong
Seattle, WA

I’m a second generation Asian American woman who married into a Caucasian family. I have always felt Americanized and never really identified with being Chinese while growing up, except for those occasions of childhood taunts that I must be smart because I’m Chinese or when I experienced the exceedingly rare occurrences of overt racism where I was refused service or ignored in a store or restaurant of a rural, all white town.
But when the Zimmerman verdict came out, I found myself arguing with a white in-law about why this is a racial issue, and that the racial tensions aren’t just a product of the media whipping people into a frenzy. The argument was on Facebook, in front of other members of my in-laws and no one else was speaking up, except for in private message of support to me or in the case of my husband, an indirect response to my brother-in-law. I feel alone and at times questioned whether I was the irrational one, but am feeling more and more like I’m either the only one who feels the need to have this confrontation or am looked to being the one who should have this confrontation because I am not white. I am “the other.”

Invisible “Whites Only” signs are everywhere.

David Moser
Seattle, WA

My own wrestling with the meaning of the Zimmerman verdict has reminded me of this passage from James Baldwin’s A Talk for Teachers: “When you go downtown you discover that you are literally in the white world. It is rich- or at least it looks rich. It is clean- because they collect the garbage downtown. There are doormen. People walk about as though they owned where they are- and indeed they do. You know- you know instinctively-that none of this is for you. You know this before you are told.”

NONE OF THIS IS FOR YOU: Those of us who are white don’t really know what it feels like to have large swaths of public space marked off-limits to us simply because of our skin color. We don’t know what it feels like to have entire streets, neighborhoods and towns look upon us with suspicion just for walking. The signs saying “Whites Only” may be gone, but there are invisible “Whites Only” signs everywhere. White people usually don’t notice these invisible signs. We don’t have to. Part of white privilege is the luxury of living our lives oblivious to these signs. But people of color see these invisible signs everyday. On streets, in restaurants, in the workplace, and in between the lines of job applications.
Trayvon Martin’s only crime was that he nonchalantly walked past one of these invisible Whites Only signs. Unlucky for him, George Zimmerman was there to enforce the unwritten law. This is America in 2013.

I would have pulled the trigger.

Alex
Seattle, WA

I’m a short biracial woman. I would never have followed Trayvon. But if it went down like the jury thinks it went down, if I were confronted by a man in the night, I would not have hesitated to fire. Its hard being tiny and female and not having a car to get around. You must walk through disrespectful sports drunks, and misogynists. Frankly (I don’t know if its my looks or what), middle-aged (not young men) black men are the worst when it comes to street harassment. Now black men get on the radio say “I am an adult man, I shouldn’t have to move through the city feeling fearful and hunted.” And I laugh. No, no one should be made to feel that way. But half the population already suffers that indignity. Welcome to our world! Maybe you can realize what it feels like and stop yelling at me how you want to split my legs wide.

Join the Newsletter

Subscription to our newsletter open soon.

Indulge in timeless elegance with our hand-curated collection of luxury vintage men’s fashion. From classic suits to iconic accessories, our online store offers a premium shopping experience for the modern gentleman who appreciates quality and style. Shop now and elevate your wardrobe with our carefully selected pieces that celebrate the art of craftsmanship and heritage fashion.